He surmised that the program might be more in Congress's wheelhouse, specifically the House and Senate Committees on Appropriations, rather than with the executive branch. "The question here is not whether something should be done it is who has the authority to do it," Roberts concluded. In his opinion, Chief Justice John Roberts scathingly wrote that the Secretary of Education's plan "has 'modified' the cited provisions only in the same sense that 'the French Revolution 'modified' the status of the French nobility'-it has abolished them and supplanted them with a new regime entirely."Īnd so, the court is probing not whether loans should be forgiven, but whether the right entity was making the push. The Biden administration was adamant that it was the appropriate law to use in connection with COVID-19, to give borrowers financial relief during and after the pandemic. The Supreme Court just struck down President Joe Biden's student-loan-forgiveness program - and it's because, in part, they don't think Biden's Education Department was the right entity to get the job done.Ī primary issue was Education Secretary Miguel Cardona's usage of the HEROES Act of 2003 to enact relief, which allows the secretary to - in theory - waive or modify student-loan balances in connection with a national emergency. ![]() Account icon An icon in the shape of a person's head and shoulders.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |